WWW.RIDESIDE.NET

home | about | tracker | comics

it devolves into boys talking about sports and hardcore

tracker / 2004 / 2

Posted by tgl on 2004-02-20 16:58:23 +0000

Boner Records

I'm at home, waiting for the Cambridge building inspector to approve my new office for use. Listening to [url=www.steelpolebathtub.com]Steel Pole Bath Tub[/url], record came out in 1990 on Boner Records out of Berkeley CA. Are there less indie record labels now then 10 years ago? Just wondering.
Posted by frame609 on 2004-02-20 19:37:41 +0000
I'm a post-scenester. I wouldn't know.
Posted by bizquig3000 on 2004-02-26 18:14:05 +0000
It seems to me that with duplication costs pretty low, and recording costs equally as low, it would make sense there are more indies now. Case in point, take a look see at the next week of pitchfork reviews and I'll probably bet good money that there will be at least a minimum of 15 different labels represented (out of a possible 25). Hell, the non-existent Local 33 1/3 Label got, count 'em, two different reviews on pitchfork. That, my friends, is 100% of our roster! -B
E-mail to tgl@rideside.net to add your tumblr.
Find me on github.