WWW.RIDESIDE.NET

home | about | tracker | comics

throwing shoes since '04
Posted by rladew on 2005-05-20 02:04:04 +0000

Politics in the Films Of George Lucas

Ive been running aroung w/ a lot of images from THX and American Graffiti in my head since yr post the other day. If one is making an effective political statement through the art of filmmaking, these two resonante the loudest with me. The biggest irony / chortle I had in hearing Lucas's recent comments @ Cannes about how bad its gotten in America and how we are like a teensy weensy thread away from being a dictatorship was that Lucas, through the vertical integration of every piece of the filmmaking process except for distribution (thanks 20th Century Fox)has become a teensey weensy bit of a dictator himself. Did anyone hear the NPR piece about Lucas's tendencies of isolation and strained relations w/ Fox throughout the making of the Prequels? Interesting stuff. In order for Lucas to rail against the system, he had to create an even bigger system and rule that new system that he created with an iron fist. Is Lucas more like Luke or Anakin? Democrat or Republican? Lover of Democratic Society or Totalitarian Rule? I guess I dont know.. but these were questions rattling around my mind, once I got over gushing on about how cool Yoda is. Back to the 2 earlier Lucas Films for a moment: THX: everyone self medicating to deny their human emotions and sexuality, everyone going to a center where they can hold on to a new shiny yellow box, which people take home, get rid of, just to go out to get the exact same new yellow box again... I feel like this stuff was a much better social / political commentary on the so-called need for mindless consumerism and the increasing role of governmental control at the expense of personal freedom than two opponents with laser swords saying "I Have a Bad Feeling about this" every 15 minutes or so American Graffiti: One of the most powerful Vietnam metaphors / political statements in film I have ever seen is @ the end of this film, when Paul Le Mat's character is standing over the flaming carcass of his hot rod, realizing that his whole way of life of cruising the strip , listening to Wolfman Jack , picking up girls and taunting other aspiring motor heads is about to change, along with the the rest of America (and the world for that matter) leaving the late 50's / early 60's and diving into the Vietnam era. SW is so full of merchandising, cops / robbers, cowboys / indians, Jedi / Sith, whatever, that beyond general myths and archetypes its hard for me to take any serious political commentary from Lucas from these 6 films. Corporate greed, the crumbling of democracy, being punished for standing out amongst the crowd seem to be things Lucas railed against in his earlier films, but he was so intent on destroying the above things independently from others that he had to cretae his own system of corporate greed and dictatorship through Lucasfilm to get them. Just my .02

Posted by dawnbixtler on 2005-05-20 16:21:20 +0000
Wow, do I disagree. Lucas is not in government. Lucas just bucked the system. Technically SW, except for the first one, Ep IV - A New Hope, are independent Films. Yes, the "little man" got huge in this case, but it is practically the opposite of a dictator.

Posted by rladew on 2005-05-20 17:45:47 +0000
I understand and respect your disagreement with my dictator comments. I think we can all agree Lucas is in the entertainment biz and not the government biz. But what about my comments of THX and A. graffiti? Do you think Star Wars has better and more accurate social and political commentary than the former 2 mentioned Lucas films? You're certaintly entitled to think so, but most of the respected film critics (Kael, Ebert, Biskind come to mind) and Lucas's own peers (Coppola, Scorsese, Depalma etc) would argue otherwise. Star Wars kicks butt, but a mirror for our times it aint. I wonder how much of an empire Lucasfilm would've been able to create if he didn't base his operation in the "crumbling democracy" of the United States. What about China? Im sure Lucas would love their lax intellectual property laws that would gleefully distribute his product without compensating him for it... _______________________________

Posted by dawnbixtler on 2005-05-20 18:14:06 +0000
Give me a minute, I'm entertaining friends from out of town right now...

Posted by tgl on 2005-05-20 19:14:10 +0000
The Chinese will gleefully reproduce your Intellectual Property whether you live there or not. Lucas was on Charlie Rose last night. What a pompous prick, he basically described himself as the Michelangelo of our times. I'm still waiting for THX-1139. I'm glad we can agree that Lucas is part of the Industrial Entertainment Complex, not the Government. He's an artist practicing his craft; I thought total control was a _good_ thing in this situation. No argument here either: as social commentary, THX-1138 and A. Graffiti do a bang up job whereas S.W. deals in overarching, stale metaphors regarding Good versus Evil. Reminds one of the current Emperor, erm, President. Any creative endeavor _must_ reflect the times in which it was made. So, I can't agree that Star Wars (or any film) is purely entertainment.

Posted by rladew on 2005-05-20 19:32:31 +0000
"S.W. deals in overarching, stale metaphors regarding Good versus Evil." Thanks tgl, thats exactly what I was trying to say. _______________________________

Posted by rladew on 2005-05-20 19:34:07 +0000
Entertainment isnt, and never should be totally devoid of political statement or reflection, but some pieces of work do a better job of reflecting our society and times than others. _______________________________

E-mail to tgl@rideside.net to add your tumblr.
Find me on github.