Posted by dawnbixtler on 2006-01-13 17:55:58 +0000
A so-so band, but only 'prog' in their attire.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-13 23:35:56 +0000
Damn you for making me choose!
Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-16 18:03:11 +0000
I think this is a no-brainer, I can't believe how many of you have no brain.
Although it is true, BQ3K, that these bands have a combined 10 great hits betwixt them, Yes's hits are their good songs and Rush's hits are their commercially palatable songs.
Also, although recent concerts have proven that both of these bands currently suck, Rush sucks in a "we're trying to do new things and failing" sort of way, and Yes sucks in a "the audience is embarassed for us" sort of way.
Rush has also not broken up, nor changed their lineup with the exception of a new drummer after their eponymous album.
Posted by pamsterdam on 2006-01-16 20:43:17 +0000
OK, I still have no idea which one you like more.
Posted by buzzorhowl on 2006-01-16 21:55:39 +0000
Cheap Trick had a few good records before "The Flame".
Posted by pamsterdam on 2006-01-17 04:32:38 +0000
Man, I <strong>love</strong> Cheap Trick from that era.
Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-17 14:03:05 +0000
Sorry, Rush Rules!
Posted by tommy on 2006-01-17 14:42:50 +0000
Four observations:
(1) I don't know how many times I've heard drummers claim that Rush was awesome because their drummer is technically proficient. This is like claiming my aunt Claire would be an excellent novelist because she types really really well.
(2) Rule of thumb: All great songs are under 4 minutes. Some exceptions, not many.
(3) Rule of thumb: If your drummer or bassist is notable in any way, your band probably sucks. Exceptions: Beatles, Van Halen, That chick from the Lenny Kravitz video.
(4) Cheap Trick rules.
Posted by pamsterdam on 2006-01-17 17:00:07 +0000
(5) tommy also rules
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2006-01-17 17:01:30 +0000
'Tommy' the album or the drummer?
Posted by pamsterdam on 2006-01-17 18:30:13 +0000
Yes. (meaning = Cheap Trick)
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-17 21:46:11 +0000
<img src="http://www.cheaptrick.com/images/rnrz1ddc.jpg"></src>
Although it is true, BQ3K, that these bands have a combined 10 great hits betwixt them, Yes's hits are their good songs and Rush's hits are their commercially palatable songs.
Also, although recent concerts have proven that both of these bands currently suck, Rush sucks in a "we're trying to do new things and failing" sort of way, and Yes sucks in a "the audience is embarassed for us" sort of way.
Rush has also not broken up, nor changed their lineup with the exception of a new drummer after their eponymous album.
(1) I don't know how many times I've heard drummers claim that Rush was awesome because their drummer is technically proficient. This is like claiming my aunt Claire would be an excellent novelist because she types really really well.
(2) Rule of thumb: All great songs are under 4 minutes. Some exceptions, not many.
(3) Rule of thumb: If your drummer or bassist is notable in any way, your band probably sucks. Exceptions: Beatles, Van Halen, That chick from the Lenny Kravitz video.
(4) Cheap Trick rules.
I have a feeling '21 is gonna be a good year...