Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-26 16:20:42 +0000
Is this a fagen at all? Craigslist isn't obscure at all.
Can we review the definition of fagen? I thought it was supposed to be an obscure reference that makes everyone uncomfortable enough to stall a conversation... these days it seems to mean at best "obscure reference" more often "out of place reference" or in this case "reference"
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 16:25:53 +0000
Maybe the Onion was dropping a proprietary eponym...
Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-26 16:31:09 +0000
nope, I've never seen "craigslist" used to describe anything other than craigslist.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 16:33:37 +0000
ok then. sorry for the incorrect post. my attempt to be humorous has been futile.
Posted by buzzorhowl on 2006-01-26 16:37:45 +0000
10D putting the foot down.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 16:39:58 +0000
Occasionally, it becomes a little bit "unforgiving" around these parts...
Posted by G lib on 2006-01-26 16:46:02 +0000
Null, this post made me laugh. Thanks.
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2006-01-26 17:05:19 +0000
10D drops a much maligned "at best".
Poor form.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 18:42:37 +0000
you guys win. now leave me the (with apologies to mr. mister)fukc alone...
Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-26 18:49:19 +0000
No no, dawn was slapping me here... um, he was, uh... at best, out of line, though.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 18:54:56 +0000
I was more making a subtle announcemnt about removing my smarmy (NON) prefix to the fagen word in the title.
Posted by tendiamonds on 2006-01-26 18:56:11 +0000
I saw that, well done.
Posted by Null Protocol on 2006-01-26 18:59:59 +0000
Hey, its the least I could do.
I figured in addition to proving you right I could at least complement that favor and display how incorrect I was to the rest of the world for all eternity.