I was interested in reading the Herald's front page story today, the graphic peering at me from newspaper boxes was so very appealing. I'm a little disappointed that the "news article" is barely a full page, <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=159173">see here</a>. Here's one for the files: relying solely on AP reports for a front page story is to be called a "fargen". I'm not a regular front-half-of-the-Herald reader, so maybe that's par for the course.
<!--break-->
Then again, they didn't describe how Wallace had his <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/24/fox-clinton-interview-part-1-osama-bin-laden/">hat</a> handed to him.
Hey, Wallace, if you don't want to hear the answer, don't ask the damn question! It was brutal to hear Wallace be like, "Can we talk about the Clinton Global Initiative", after Clinton thrashed FOX. Perfect. The only way it could have been better if Clinton had gotten Wallce and the Fox Network to _promise_ to ask GW Bush or Cheney why they "didn't connect the dots." Fox bias has almost no bounds.
And yes, the Herald forgot to mention Wallace came off like an ass, and Clinton called him on it.