WWW.RIDESIDE.NET

home | about | tracker | comics

throwing shoes since '04
Posted by pamsterdam on 2007-03-06 06:45:56 +0000

Notes on a Scandal

I just saw this film yesterday, so my thoughts are a bit cluttered. I'm interested in your thoughts... I don't think I believe in 90-minute dramas. 90-minute comedies, 90-minute action flicks, sure. But a drama requires at least 2 hours, I reckon. Epoisses put his finger on it with the torn diary comment (in the Do the Right Thing forum). This would have been an ideal opportunity to show more of both characters, to draw out this discovery, to give us more time inside their skin. I wished I'd had more time to feel Barbara's loneliness, and also to spend more time getting to know Sheba. I feel convinced that the original script must have had at least 20 minutes more between Sheba moving in with Barbara and discovering the diaries. I fell in love with all 3 main characters in any case, quite shocking for me. I hadn't expected to feel tenderness for Sheba or to hope that Barbara would find what she's looking for. Richard's character (played by Bill Nighy, who I adore) was a predictable object of tenderness and protective feelings. That Barbara & Sheba also awakened these feelings in me felt... surprising. And unsettling. I found myself wondering how I "should" feel, from both the filmmaker's perspective and that of society. Great film, but too short and missing the most vital bit (as I said above). Edited to add: I have ambivalent feelings about the son. I appreciated that Sheba spoke about how difficult she'd found raising a child with a disability, but he did seem to be yet another "angelic disabled child" - which reminded me of our discussions last month about Crispin Glover.

Posted by pamsterdam on 2007-03-06 06:45:30 +0000
Oh, and has anyone read Zoe Heller's novel, on which the film was based?

Posted by Epoisses on 2007-03-06 06:47:05 +0000
I enjoyed the performances, but man, that fucking diary bit was tough, as was the fact that there's not too much evidence in Sheba's unhappiness at home (and her subsequent affair). She seemed happy enough, so her affair was a little clunky. I still wound up liking it despite those bits, though. A director's cut would rule.

Posted by pamsterdam on 2007-03-06 07:01:13 +0000
Yes, that's also true (the absence of hard evidence regarding Sheba's unhappiness). However... I felt that I was able to fill in the blanks - a much older husband who she married at the age of 20, 10 years out of the job market (all of her 30's) devoted to caring for a disabled and rambunctious child... those two factors together with her lie about Richard being her uncle (when the boy saw him) and the way she held herself like a teenager whenever she was with the boy (the slouch, the Siouxsie Sioux remembrances) - I almost felt as if she felt she'd worn her "responsible married mum" persona like a mask over her "surly post-punk sex fiend" self... but of course both are facets of the same person - that's something that a lot of people struggle with: which "me" is real? I don't think she was that unhappy in her home life, she just felt like being naughty and felt she deserved some time off for good behavior. I liked how she described it as being like having one drink too many down the pub - that's so evocative of the feeling I've had as I start doing something I know I shouldn't: it's just so easy, a slippery slope my father would say. And remember how angry she was with Barbara when she'd written that Sheba would be better off without her husband & kids? I would love to see a director's cut.

Posted by Epoisses on 2007-03-06 07:20:09 +0000
The Siouxsie stuff was fairly infuriating because it was so underdone -- that record was obviously supposed to be a symbol of her wild times, but it was super niche-y (I almost missed it). Again, more time woulda done wonders.

Posted by pamsterdam on 2007-03-06 08:34:34 +0000
Again, I agree. Especially when she made up her face all gothy at Barbara's house - there should have been more of a sense of her feeling pent up before then.

Posted by Epoisses on 2007-03-07 01:58:54 +0000
Yep.

Posted by mahatma chani on 2007-03-07 15:19:14 +0000
This film has my new favorite working British actor: Bill Nighy.

Posted by tgl on 2007-03-07 15:24:54 +0000
I was a little disappointed when I discovered Bill Nighy is not Bill Nye. I might go with Hugh Laurie.

Posted by pamsterdam on 2007-03-07 15:40:14 +0000
Bill Nighy = super sexy Bill Nye = not so much Hugh Laurie = also super sexy Hugh Jackman = ditto Hugh Grant = super duper icky

E-mail to tgl@rideside.net to add your tumblr.
Find me on github.