reply to the comment you are replying too
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-08 16:37:07 +0000
Purple America
Swiped this from the Sunday Glob. A little more comforting than the Red-Blue diachotomy, particularly since I think that particular metaphor is false. The US is divided, not primarily by state.
Maybe 3% of the popular vote is a "mandate". However, if Bush screws up his second chance by alienating even more voters, then Rove's long sought Republican ruling majority might not materialize.
Of course, I always thought Bush had alienated enough voters the first time around.
Maybe 3% of the popular vote is a "mandate". However, if Bush screws up his second chance by alienating even more voters, then Rove's long sought Republican ruling majority might not materialize.
Of course, I always thought Bush had alienated enough voters the first time around.
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2004-11-08 16:58:24 +0000
I'm seeing a lot of purple....
Posted by rladew on 2004-11-08 17:31:49 +0000
you know, I spent some time w/ the good ole globe this weekend and I read Jim Moore's ' The Man With The Plan' (Ideas section page D12 - sorry guys - not for free on Boston.com - I checked)article about what a sick twisted fuck Karl Rove is.
I read the Atlantic article (Nov 2004) that was linked on Rideside as well.
At this point, I think Im gonna have to go to the bookstore and read Moore's book 'Bush's brain' so I can learn more.
I can see that Rove is a "tricksy" strategist, but is his vision of America ultimately, as Moore puts it "a dream of a one party America" ?
And isnt it the job of the Democratic party to come up with a strong enough platform that will deflect the so-called smoke and mirrors of Rove, or is it Rove's fault exclusively, as Moore suggests, that the Democratic party is "too weak to compete" because Rove has turned the government into a" vestigial organ"?
Interesting stuff that I don't know the answers to.....
_______________________________
“When you’re creating your own shit, man, even the sky ain’t the limit.†Miles Davis
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-08 17:44:05 +0000
I don't think Rove calls it "a one party America" per se, in his language it's a "working Republican majority" for the next 30 years.
The Democratic Party has fielded two weak candidates that Bush has beaten once by a hair, and now by an inch. It's pretty obvious how Rove, "the Architect" in Bush's words, operates. Why the Dems can't figure that out and counter it is beyond me.
I'm currently waffling about whether it's moral values, better information or what.
Maybe this time, Bob Shrum and Terry McAuliffe have been thoroughly repudiated. The Dems need new leadership. I don't know enough to say who that might be.
"Bush's Brain" isn't by Michael Moore, I thought, it's by the author of that column you read on Sunday. I could be wrong...
Posted by rladew on 2004-11-08 17:51:15 +0000
I think its Jim Moore, although the name Moore in politics does seem to elicit certain associations...
_______________________________
“When you’re creating your own shit, man, even the sky ain’t the limit.†Miles Davis
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-08 19:05:33 +0000
Nice...
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2004-11-08 19:40:22 +0000
Wow, Utah is red.... Commies!
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-09 22:32:34 +0000
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/
Those UofM kids...
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-09 22:33:12 +0000
Yeah, got the link from A. Sullivan. I could be a gay Republican for all I know!
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2004-11-09 22:34:29 +0000
I see a lot of blue in the cartogram:
Posted by tgl on 2004-11-09 22:38:04 +0000
That's b/c you are on drugs.
Posted by dawnbixtler on 2004-11-09 22:54:19 +0000
No, I am as sober as a judge. Not that drunk Scalia though...
E-mail to tgl@rideside.net to add your tumblr.
Find me on github.