WWW.RIDESIDE.NET

Posted by tgl on 2005-11-09 16:00:40 +0000

34 X 32

I'm always a little uncertain which size to pick up when refereshing my Dickies(R) 847(TM) collection. I have a couple, two, three too many pairs in 32x30. Although, those tend to be OK after I let out the ass. The 32 length is a little long, 30 is a little short. I've never seen a 31 in a store. Maybe I should work on my new hemming technique.

Posted by Honar the librarian on 2005-11-09 16:57:48 +0000

I too have the 30/32 length problem, and once went so far as to ask my retail salesperson if I could get jeans in a 31. Sadly, the answer was no. I just tend to wear different jeans with different shoes (30 with sneakers, flip flops, 32 with clogs, and I've been considering 34 to go with certain pairs of high heels, but high heels make my knees hurt and jeans that fit are expensive so it's probably not worth it), since my new hemming technique is laughable, at best.

Posted by frame609 on 2005-11-09 16:58:06 +0000

You could roll 'em. You still fit into a 32? Damn!

Posted by tgl on 2005-11-09 17:03:06 +0000

This sort of begs the question: should a man hang his Milwaukee tumor over the belt or keep it restrained inside the waistband?

Posted by Miriam on 2005-11-09 17:08:54 +0000

Always opt for the over-the-belt maneuver. The bulging waistband reminds me of old men at synagogue.

Posted by frame609 on 2005-11-09 17:22:40 +0000

'Milwaukee tumor' is pretty hot.

Posted by rladew on 2005-11-09 17:48:51 +0000

you guys are all pencils :) _______________________________

Posted by tendiamonds on 2005-11-09 18:19:23 +0000

...depends on if he has a long-belt.

Posted by tendiamonds on 2005-11-09 18:20:05 +0000

I had to abandon the 34 for 36 for a while there... I'm back to the 34, though.

WWW.RIDESIDE.NET

home | about | tracker | comics

tracker / 2005 / 11

34 X 32